Novel Adaptations

If I ever become a filmmaker, here are a few  books I would dream of adapting.  Of course that would take years, millions, and overcoming lots of legal obstacles.  Some have been done before, but not adequately.  And of course some could be done before I became filmmaker. This is only a partial list and does not mean I do not have interest in making films in other genres (because I do).  Of course I also have other original stories to prosecute.

The Virgin Suicides (perhaps in digital backlot)

The Cult Next Door

The Madness of Mary Lincoln

The Feast of the Goat

Last Night I Dreamed of Peace

The Vanishing Act of Esme Lennox

Out of the Dust 

Oyster (Janette Turner Hospital)

World Without End

The Jungle

A Tale of Two Cities

Great Charities

Here are the charities I'll be giving to this holiday season; I encourage anyone to look them over.

SOS Children's Villages-USA

The Sudan Project (Ginghamsburg)

Basic Needs

1010 Project

Opportunity International

Water Missions International

Not For Sale

Athletics-helping to kill education

      Tippecanoe High School has boys and girls basketball games scheduled for Dec. 23, two days before Christmas.  It is a little appalling, however not surprising, that there are high school sporting events going on just two days before Christmas.  You would think no schools would schedule sporting events, so families could travel to relatives or enjoy time with each other.  But that is outdated.  Athletics have taken over education and are doing significant damage.

      Long ago, sports were just a leisure activity.  Something to have fun with.  Maybe to help instill a few values like teamwork, hard work, etc.  There was some friendly pride with other schools involved.   Some excelled and played in college and a few even professionally, where the stakes were high and the competition intense.  School sports are now void of that innocence.

      Sports are no longer just a distraction.  They are the focus, often impeding the work of teachers.  To make a team you often have to play AAU or offseason leagues  Many teams hold practices that run several hours long several nights a week, if not every night.  Many teams now require time for film viewing or workouts on weekend, or even practicing.  By the time athletes get home most night's they are already physically and mentally exhausted - yet they are somehow supposed to do homework and study - of course, there is no time for freetime.  It is even worse on nights when there are games.  There is no quality time to study after school.  The game goes late.  If it is an away game, students supposedly can do their homework on the bus. Of course that will never happen.  By the time the students are done with the game and home, there is no time to study, and if the student does study, it will likely be very unproductive or cut into their sleep - leading to tiredness and sleeping in school the next day, which make the next day that much more unproductive.  And the next day there is probably practice.  This repeats and the student gets more and more worn out, grades keep dropping, and soon they are falling way behind other students.

     More emphasis is often put on sports than education (even if it is not admitted).  It is sad that at most schools a student can participate in sports with a low GPA- sometimes as low as a 1.0 and usually no higher than a 2.0.  I think it is a privilege, not a right, to participate in athletics.  In fact, I think it is a responsibility.  You are representing the school and trying to prove you are the better school.  You are the best the school has.  

      The most disturbing thing is parents that pressure their kids in sports.  To become involved in many sports these days, you have to give up your weekends, spring breaks, vacations, summers to dedicate their lives to sports.  Children are being robbed of their childhoods.  Even the most important things are being destroyed.  Not just education, but practices and games often cause families not to eat dinner together regularly, instead forcing people to pick up fast food.  (Causing not only family breakdown but overweight children.)  Many parents put so much pressure on having one type of talent -athletic talent- instead of letting the children develop their real talents and interests.  It seems every parent thinks their kid is the next superstar and they have to spends loads of money and time traveling, attending camps. training, to get the most out of their kids.  It is no longer fun.  And coaches that get into education so they can coach make it their life, working on it year-around.  Teachers are often hired not because they are the best educator but because they can coach.  The coaches make it sports become a job.  Everything revolves around it.  Getting good grades is necessary so you can stay eligible.  The more practices the better.  Even if it cuts into education.  No more spring break, no more summer break, or Christmas vacation.  We have to stay in town for our sports.         Much of school sports is just politics anyway, so you have to be in a certain family or group to get on a team or play.  School sports is no longer a positive pursuit.  It isn't fun, it is overwhelming.  The primary goal is winning.  Sports are winning.  And education is losing. Sports are a great, great thing.  I am a HUGE sports fan.  But in our hypercompetitive society, they are losing their meaning.    

 

Reds Offseason Moves

Continuing in the tradition of discussing a die and often unrelated subjects, I present my offseason plan for the Reds. 

The Reds have done a pretty good job this offseason, but there are a few things I would do if I were the general manager instead of Walt Jocketty.

First, I would trade for Jeff Francoeur.  He struggled with the Braves last year and could use a change of scenery.  The Reds, of course, are looking for a right-handing hitting rightfielder. Check. He's struggled a little with his power and slugging numbers, but they should go up in the hitter-friendly Great American Ballpark.  With the Reds, he would not be asked to hit cleanup and face so much pressure, as he often was (or is) with the Braves.  He is also a good defensive player and could further solidify the young nuclear of the Reds.  He is already a star, but would be best in a park like GABP, without the hometown pressure or tension, which manifest last year when he was sent down to the Braves Double-A minor league affiliate.  He could come for fairly cheap, probably Ryan Freel and Homer Bailey and a prospect, such as one of the young shortstops, like Chris Valaika or Todd Frazier, or even a Ryan  Freel and Matt Belisle combo.

Second, I would sign Ivan Rodriguez.  He can repeat his 2003 performance when he led the young Florida Marlins to a World Series championship.  He can mentor the young catcher, Ryan Hanigan, and play, say 60% of the time.  It would also be great for the young latino players like Johnny Cueto and Edison Volquez to have a battery mate and mentor like Rodriguez.

Third, sign Dennys Reyes.  The Reds need a veteran left-handed specialist, and I'm a sucker for getting ex-Reds back in town.

Fourth, bring Sean Casey back.  Just because I love Sean Casey.

Fifth, I would pursue Milton Bradley, even if Jerry Hairiston is resigned.  Neither stays healthy, but both would provide a right-handed spark to the lineup.  Even if both stayed healthy, Hairiston is valuable in a utility role, so he could find plenty of playing time.  I would say an incentive-laden contract would be best, but is probably unlikely because he'll try to get a big deal because of all of his past problems staying on the field.  A three year deal, worth somewhere in the neighborhood of 22-28 million would do the trick, with a fourth-year option worth around 11 million.  I would offer Hairiston a one-year deal worth a base salary of 2.75 million and plenty of incentives.  A second-year option would also be included, worth about 6 million, without major incentives.  

All of these moves would be very cost-effective, be restore the offense, finding a middle way between homer-focused run production and small ball.  The  defense would also be better, which will be crucial to the Reds this year.   

Tom Cruise

I think Tom Cruise gets a bad rap.  He's said some pretty outrageous things.  His association with the Church of Scientology has made some people think he is crazy.  But watching an interview with him, as I am right now, a few things come across.  He seems pretty normal, nice, and very talented.  Hopefully, it will be another lesson, that has to be relearned, that you shouldn't judge a book by a cover or make quick assumptions.  And I can't wait for Valkyrie.

At first I was upset Cruise was given the role.  He doesn't come across as German and it's hard to think of him as a historical figure when it is Tom Cruise.  It's hard to forget it's supposed to not be him.  But the more I look at it, I think he the role suits him just fine.    

Obama-Progress?

      I'm worried many people don't fully understand the importance of the election of Barack Obama. (myself included.)  It is hard for somebody who hasn't had the experiences of a persecuted people, like a white person for instance, to understand what they have gone through.  The importance of the election of the first black president in American history cannot be overstated.  

      Racism has been one of the the world's greatest evils.  It has disenfranchised millions of people, led to the breakup of thousands of families, and destroyed generations of blacks.  It (sometimes literally) raped an entire race of people.  It has led to so many of the world's modern problems. Colonization led to chaos in Africa.  It has led to a region to become enslaved (no pun intended) to amazing poverty, medical crises (including the AIDS epidemic), and continuous war, as people fight over resources, land, and power.  Racism has been manifested in genocide and a tremendous income and educational gap.  In the U.S. racism has led not only to slavery and persecution, but now to a race that fails to find a comfortable or appropriate identity.

      America was one of the last countries to outlaw slavery and has had one of the most difficult times overcoming racism.  Luckily, the country that may have had the most difficult time, South Africa, elected a black as president almost two decades ago.  That is why it is so important that America has elected a black person.  It has always, historically, been one of the last countries to deal with racial problems.  The world doesn't like America much right now. And the world is watching.  It is a historic moment not just for the United States, but the entire civilized world.   

      Obama's heritage and story make him perfect to be the first black president.  He's half black, and grew up with his white mother and grandparents.  He lived was raised in Kenya and Hawa'ii.  His heritage serves as sort of a symbolic bridge.  We are not to complete racial equality or justice now, but we are getting there.  It is only appropriate that in a country with such diversity as America, the first black president has such a heritage.  I am proud because this election represents progress in two ways.  First, obviously, is the fact that a black man was elected.  Second, however, America didn't fall prey to fear and repeat its past mistakes.  Even with all of the anti-Muslim hysteria, it still elected a president with ties to Islam and an Islamic name.

      I am hopeful, though cautiously skeptical, that this could be a new start for America.  The past eight years, everything has been blamed on Bush and the Republicans.  Worldwide, once positive opinions of America have turned negative.  With so many Americans having such great admiration for Obama and so many foreigners so excited about his election, I hope we pursue a polity that is a little more civilized.  Human nature probably guarantees combative and power politics, hopefully, in this new age of development, things can be a little more pragmatic and solution-oriented.  The world is in an unprecedented era of globalization and interdependence, economically, technologically, etc.  It is amazing that a man like Obama, with his heritage, has been elected the leader of the free world.  While I would disagree with Nancy Pelosi that he is sent from God, or with Louis Farrakhan that he is the messiah, in some ways, he may be.             

Societal Problems

The problem's in today's society are so easily understood.

We spend money we don't have, have sex without any responsibility, do drugs and alcohol without any responsibility, have kids without any responsibility, get married without any responsibility. 

We antagonize people that aren't like them or don't think like them.

We kill people who kill to show people that killing is bad.

Jeremiah Wright

I see Jeremiah Wright preached an anniversary sermon at Trinity United, once again criticizing Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and once again compared them to those that beat and brutalized Jesus.  He also referenced the "dizzying broad on the View" and "educated her".  (She is a Christian by the way, usually you pray for fellow Christians not condemn them, but of course Wright can't do that.)  I just love Wright's humility.  And I'm sure Jesus called the woman at the well the "dizzying broad".  It seems every time he speaks the Reverend Wright gets a little less like Jesus and makes people a little more hateful. 

Dying American Dream?

      One thing phrase that has popped up during political speeches the last few years (almost exclusively by Democrats) is the "dying American Dream".  Most notably, it was used as the central theme of Joe Biden's DNC speech.  Even if the phrase isn't blatantly mentioned in speeches or town hall meetings, the idea is often present in a latent way.  The idea centers around the idea that wages are dropping, manufacturing jobs are leaving the country (resulting in less jobs overall), and education is becoming more expensive.  The idea is usually pitched to low wage-earners.  Many already believe it, though, so it isn't hard to convince them.  However, I would strongly question this notion.

      I would think that most Americans would be happy about their labor options.  Until a few decades ago the vast majority of the population had two options: farming and manufacturing. Most opportunity was for vertical, not horizontal, promotion.  Meaning that people usually couldn't change careers, they had to move up within their company or be recruited to a better job in the same industry.  Today people can make a living nearly any way they want.  There are literally thousands of career to choose from.  This is certainly not a negative development.  The diversification of the laborforce should not be overlooked.     

Living conditions are not mentioned.  Housing is safe.  Most water and food is safe. Sanitation is good and people are generally well-bathed.  People take those things for granted. But that is only a recent development.  For much of the country's history there was tainted food and water and people couldn't trust that what they were eating was healthy let alone safe. People now have more food options than ever.  In the past living conditions were downright filthy and often dangerous.

      Racial and religious equality is also not included.  American society is more tolerant than ever.  There is no longer outright racial or religious persecution.    

      The availability of college education is frequently mentioned explicitly.  But like labor, there is more opportunity than ever.  There is an incredible and unparalleled diversification.  There are small schools, big schools, private and public.  Religious and secular.  Four years schools, community colleges, and conservatories.   Often times, Democrats seem to want the college of every student in America paid for or somehow subsidized.  However, this is not needed.  The fact is that there are many, many young adults that shouldn't be in college.  For these students there are more options than ever.  Not only are there community colleges, but a tremendous number and variety of technical schools.  Students shouldn't have trouble paying for a college education.  There are of course the option of community colleges, as stated.  But there are also many opportunities for aid.  If you are poor and/or work hard, you will be able to get scholarships or grants.  It just takes some creativity and smart thinking.  Loans are also readily-available and if one is responsible they won't take that long to pay off.

      There is also the issue of manufacturing jobs leaving the country.  Firstly, this accepts the lump of labor fallacy.  But it is not as if the loss of manufacturing jobs is a necessarily a bad thing.  There will always be factory jobs.  It is a natural and positive development for economies to change away from a manufacturing-based economy.  It is a natural progression, societies move from agriculture to manufacturing to service.  This usually means that wages and white-collar jobs are increasing.  Just because jobs from a certain sector are decreasing, that doesn't mean the economy is worse.  It just means it is changing.  This doesn't mean that we should go crazy.  An positive reaction would be accept it and create more job-training and transition centers.

      There would be several key indicators to evaluate this statement.  One would be be the number of college attendees.  If college was really so outrageously expensive, there would be a very low college graduation rate.  However, this is not the case.  There are far more college attendees and graduation than ever before.  The very discussion reflects the change.  It is no longer seen as a privilege but a right.  Another indicator would ask about the unemployment rate.  If there were that many fewer jobs, and jobs were that much harder to come by, then the unemployment rate would be very high.  However, it is actually relatively low.  For much of the great depression the unemployment rate was over twenty percent.  Now it is roughly a third of that.  (Of course a fully-productive, healthy economy will produce an unemployment rate of around five percent.)  More people than ever have an opportunity to pursue their version of the American dream.  The problem is that most people want it to come easily.  But the whole idea is to work hard and have the work pay off.  I would not agree with the idea that the American dream is dying.  I think it is clear that it isn't.  So why would one say it?  Because there are people who believe it, and those people have votes. 

Things I Could Do Without In College

-Long lectures

-Long papers

-Huge reading assignments

-Very leftist profs

-Exams

-Students who talk too much or always raise their hand

-Sidewalk preachers

All of these things are probably necessary for the proper college experience, but I could do without any of them.

Insulting Politics

      We were treated to an unusual amount of insulting politics this year.  Politics that played on people's fears and wasn't honest.  Of course, politics isn't honest.  And the politicians don't care. It is both sides framing the debate.  Saying the other side only cares about rich people or the other side doesn't like America.  Instead of going above name-calling, which are usually false labels, they embrace them.  Because the fact is, most people on both sides are too stupid to know what is true and what isn't.  Not even that they aren't intelligent enough, just that most people don't care.  They have preconceived notions and ideas about the other side (or positive thoughts about their side) and they don't want them changed.  

      In typical Democratic fashion, the Democrats tried to show that they were on the side of the little guy.  There were countless comments about the struggles of "blue-collar workers" and mention after mention of specific lower-paying jobs -factory workers, nurses, firefighters, teachers.  The theory seems that if they just mention them time after time while the Republicans didn't, people would believe they cared about the folks while Republicans didn't.  They attempted to further ingrain this by saying as often as possible that Republicans wanted to give tax cuts to the rich and big business.

       The Republicans had a problem.  Republicans seem to be largely inept when it comes to communicating and how to shape a message.  They rarely tried to speak to these people, for whatever reason.  Finally, they realized they needed to do a better job.  So what did they do?They used Sarah Palin.  They had her openly identify herself as one of these type people, calling herself a "hockey mom".  While the Democrats tried to paint the Republicans as out of touch and elitist, the Republicans tried to do the same thing, using Palin to present themselves as regular, hard-working people while the Democrats were big spenders and big taxers who didn't care about small-town America.  Republicans continually tried to paint this picture.  Palin talked about the "average Joe's" and " Joe six-pack".  They tried to use Obama's connections to Hollywierd and his statements about rural America.  After Republicans made modest gains among small-town independents and locked up their base, Democrats fought back by trying to paint Palin as too much of a regular person, stupid, effectively, and extremist.  They also tried to catch John McCain on how many homes he owned.  If they hadn't already embarrassed themselves enough by employing such language as "hockey mom" "Joe six-pack", Republicans used  stooped to a new-low.  They began talking constantly about "Joe the Plumber" and to a lesser extent, "Tito the Construction Worker".  They weren't ashamed either.  Some Republicans continued to try and label Obama as a Muslim or not a U.S. citizen.  Democrats talked about the fact that John McCain wasn't tech savvy or that Sarah Palin didn't believe in evolution. 

      Ultimately, the Democrats were able to fool America better, making Americans believe that Republicans only cared about the rich.  Interestingly enough, they made it a negative to be elitist or rich.  But they also made it a negative to be too normal, stupid, in essence, like Palin. Most politicians know that the America people really aren't that bright most of the time.  They don't pay attention that closely to the news.  They don't know the context of the stories.  That's why the founding fathers created the electoral college - because they didn't trust the people to be the ultimate decision-makers.  Politicians say things like "Are you better off than you were four years ago?", which of course is fallacious because that implies that the president has a great degree of influence over the economy and that economic conditions remain constant, as if the economy one president inherits is the same as another.  However, it would appear to be a simple and logical question to the average person.  These are the type of things they do.  Both sides use the same tactics.  It is just a matter of how well they use them.  Every few years the tastes of the America people change and the other party is voted in power.  Politicians craft the campaign.  They know which stories they can get the media to hype. They are well-aware of how the American public thinks.  This election, they were particularly well-aware.  And those Americans that aren't stupid realized it.  It doesn't feel to good to us to know when we are being talked down to.  I'm better than "Joe-the-Plummer" nonsense and my vote isn't going to be bought by mentioning my job (and perceived struggles) often.  I don't expect this pander to end anytime soon, it's what the American people know and neither party seems to want to change that.  

My BCS Playoff Idea

      Everyone is clamoring for a playoff in college football.  The cries will probably grow louder after Texas was left out of the national championship game this year.  The game pits Oklahoma against Florida, though Texas had the same record as the Sooners and defeated them in October.

      Some people -including Texas Tech coach Mike Leach-  want a full-scale, March Madness sytle tournament with at least 64 teams.  (Of course there are only 119 college football programs that are Division 1-A while there are well over 300 Division 1-A men's basketball teams and the NCAA basketball tournament only includes 64 teams.)  

      This would probably be a mess.  The travel would be difficult and the expenses enormous.  Putting on a basketball tournament is much easier logistically than a putting on a football tournament.  Preparing for basketball games through the tournament are also much easier. Football requires more planning and takes longer to recover, physically.  For these reasons, I believe this plan wouldn't work.

   Furthermore, I frankly don't see the need for a tournament to determine the national champion.  The goal is to create a system that is fair and really does reward the national championship to the best team.  The most blatant failure was in 2004, when Auburn won the SEC with an undefeated record but wasn't selected for the national championship game, because it didn't have the #1 or #2 ranking in the final BCS poll prior to bowl selection.                Meaning, that no matter what it did, that it couldn't have gotten into the national championship game.  Which is obviously unfair.  I don't know how there wasn't a national outcry that demanded the system changed after the season.  But there fact of the matter is that most teams wouldn't have a chance to win the national championship.  If 64 teams were selected, that would most likely mean several teams from non-BCS conferences like the MAC or Big Sky would be in the tournament, and the fact is those teams aren't going to win.  In a basketball tournament, like the NCAA tournament, there is a slight chance a team could win.  It would be possible, but not likely.  However, in football it would be impossible because the best programs, OSU, USC, Florida, Michigan, Texas, Oklahoma, etc. are some much faster and so much stronger.  With good execution a basketball team that isn't that athletic can beat a very talented basketball team, but in football that won't happen for in a tournament.

       My idea is to still have your regular bowls which are outrightly selected, with each individual bowl inviting the teams they want, and nothing based on a ranking system like the BCS.  However, the BCS series still would be used.  The top 14 teams in the final BCS rankings would be invited to engage in a playoff.  This way all teams that would have a real legitimate chance to win and deserve a shot would get win - including non-BCS conference teams, like a Boise State or Utah.   There would still be some motivation for being #1 or #2.  Those teams would get a bye the first round of the playoffs.  After the first round, there would be six teams left.  After adding the # 1 and #2 teams to the mix and playing the next round there would be four teams left...and then two.  They, of course, would play in the national championship game.  The games would be played on pre-selected sites.  They would also be neutral.  So if Arizona State was to play and there was a site at the stadium in Glendale, they would have to play somewhere else.  There could still be the same traditional BCS bowls.  Round two would feature four games, and the third round would feature two games, of course (because it is eight teams playing then the four left playing for a spot in the championship, for a total of six games) so you could keep the four main games - the Sugar Bowl, Orange, Fiesta, and Rose.  Then you could also add two more-perhaps the Cotton Bowl and Citrus.  

   This system doesn't quite have all the kinks worked out yet, but it is the most reasonable, fair, and best I've seen.  (Of course I'm biased since it's my idea.)  The main problem right now is that the university presidents are concerned mostly about bowl money - how much they will get from playing and how much they will cost.  Money always seems to ruin things.  Now fans are being shortchanged.  I would be happy with any new playoff system and it's a travesty there won't be one anytime soon. 

OJ Simpson

I heard the following exchange between Neal Boortz and a caller on his radio show talking about OJ Simpson:

(paraphrasing)

Caller: I hope he gets murdered in prison and rots in hell.

Boortz: I hope he gets his throat slit a week before his sentence ends...

I hope neither man claims to be a Christian.

Removed to edit.

Why Jeremiah Wright Offended Me So Much

      The Jeremiah Wright "scandal" caused an uproar.  Partially because many, probably most white Americans don't know the history of black Protestant Christianity in America.  They don't know about the Jeremiad sermon style Wright used.  They can't sympathize with the experiences of blacks and don't understand how difficult the past is.  They don't know what goes on in black churches.   They didn't react well.  Instead of acting with peace and forgiveness, understanding, and dialogue, they lambasted Wright and didn't give him a chance.

      Perhaps one of the things that most upset me is his speaking for God.  Of course, you must be confident that your message is from God and pray that you are speaking His truth. However, it must be done humbly, not with arrogance. I am probably one of the biggest critics of American culture that you could find.  I rarely mince words about it.  However, I would never, ever, ever say "Goddamn America...it's in the Bible".  That is off the charts arrogant to say that. 

      I was also offended that somebody in the pulpit would make a crude sexual gesture when talking about Bill Clinton, someone who had invited him to the White House to honor him and fellow clergy.

      The single most distubing thing to me was his message (specifically his tone).  Pastors are supposed to represent hope and share hope.  Black people have a right to be angry, to say the least, about the past. There were terrible, terrible things done to them that are straight from hell.  However, there must come a time of reconciliation.  No whites living right now have ever owned a black slave or actively persecuted them (with the exception of white supremicists). They must lose their heavy hearts and let their mouths overflow with forgiveness.  Hundreds of thousands of whites dedicated their lives to black equality or gave their lives in the civil war. White Americans have done nearly everything possible to help them and atone for their transgressions. There was affirmative action and the Great Society.  We are not in the 1800s. Blacks need to get over the past. (And whites must understand why that is so difficult for them.)  They must not look past it or forget about it, but they must not dwell on it or use it as an excuse.  Yet Jeremiah Wright didn't preach that.  He should have shared the prophetic message of Jesus and talked about forgiveness and love, not preach hate or encourage blacks to begrudge their white brothers and sisters.  He was cultivating bitterness. It is up to Christians to change culture, not encourage it.  Blacks have focused on the past for decades.  Everyone acknowledges the sins committed.  He should speak to the problems blacks are creating themselves through things like gang violence, drug addiction and trafficking, promiscuity, teenage pregnancy and abandonment, violent, sexual, and sexist rap lyrics, and failure to act responsibly. Reverend Wright was focusing on the dark truth of history, but Jesus wants us to focus on the light!  He can lead us to overcome!  He is the messiah and the savior and He can and will deliever us!  But only if we let him!  He doesn't want to focus on the old, he wants to create something new and beautiful that is full of mercy and love, not something focused on the past filled with animosity. The fruits of the spirit are love, joy, peace, patience...I didn't see much of that when he was saying the U.S.K.K.A. or Goddamn  America, racism runs the country, that the country is run by rich white people, or that Bill Clinton did America just like Monica. His tone is not respectful or loving and that doesn't sound like a positive message that is loving or peaceful.  My favorite bible passage reads "And what does God require of you?  Do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God."  Wright has done justice.  He's done great work in the inner city and poverty.  He should be honored, praised, and commended.  But there are two other requirements, loving mercy and walking humbly.  Jeremiah Wright spoke out of personal spite and anger and arrogance when making these remarks.  You can see it in his mannerisms.  I actually agree with many of the sentiments he espoused, but I can't get over his attitude.  He wasn't leading the black community to forgiveness or a new era of racial justice and dialogue, he led them to more hate, while dividing the Christian community and driving white Christians away.

Whose Jobs? Whose Helping?

One thing I heard during this election cycle often from Democrats is that Republicans were giving tax cuts to companies that were taking jobs overseas.  The rage over "outsourcing" was also present in the 2004 presidential election as well, with John Kerry and John Edwards going so far as to term this companies "Benedict Arnold" companies, which was frequently repeated by supporters.  My question is who these companies are betraying?

Of course it's not true that Republicans are cutting taxes on these companies because they are outsourcing jobs, which is what Democrats make it sound like.  Republicans think that taxes obstruct businesses, and therefore hurt the economy, so of course they are going to support tax cuts for these corporations.  They aren't cutting taxes so they will, or because they do, ship jobs overseas.  There is no intended causality between the two.  Of course, higher taxes and more demands by unions (like cardcheck) would lead  companies to outsource jobs and higher prices, so it would make much more sense to say that Democrats are really leading the companies to outsource and  are really the ones hurting people.  This isn't even mentioning the fact that many economists believe outsourcing is good for the economy.  

Of course, the implication of this "betrayal" argument is that these corporations are betraying America or some American people.  It is a natural and understandable to at first have negative reaction to these companies giving jobs to foreigners, not Americans.  It is natural to like people that are like us.  But, after thinking about it, I can't find any sufficient answer as to why Americans deserve these jobs, except for the fact they are, well, American.  The only argument I see is on the grounds of xenophobia, ethnocentrism, or racism.  Of course most people that are complaining about outsourcing are not overtly racist or classist, it is only a prejudice that most people struggle with (partially natural, partially socially-imbedded) to prefer people we know and like.

These companies have a right to hire whomever they want.  They risk their assets, livelihood, and time running a business.  It is obviously cheaper to employ foreigners who will work for less.  From a business standpoint, it would be downright dumb to keep jobs in America.  So, the people who hate outsourcing companies want them to make decision that will hurt their own company.

The person that the companies hires overseas is no less of a person than an American. If they are African, Asian, Arab, or Hispanic they are no less of a person.  They don't deserve the job any less.  In fact, they are more than likely poorer than the American worker, in some cases they are desperately poor.  They need the job more than the American.

It is a painful experience for someone to lose a job.  In time, however, they will likely find a new job.  In many cases, a better job.  Businesses don't owe them anything.  Entrepreneurs don't start companies for employees, they start companies for themselves.  They have the right to do whatever they want with their money.  They risked their own money, not their future employees' money.  It is nobody's right to demand that they make a bad business move.  It is not a bad thing if American politicians want to try and keep jobs in America.  That's fine.  What is going to attract companies to stay in America?  Lower taxes and more freedom for companies, such as less of an obstructive influence from labor unions.

Who is trying to promote these things?  Republicans.

The Democratic approach defies logic.  A company outsources jobs so you raise taxes and promote unionization.  That won't do anything but encourage companies to outsource more jobs.

So who is really helping American workers?  Republicans.

Of course many of the politicians making these claims are hyprocrites themselves.  John Edwards, one of the loudest voices of opposition, for instance, has put millions of dollars into offshore hedgefunds to evade taxes, and many more hold stock in companies that are outsourcing.   

Bond Movies

My top five Bond movies:

1. The Spy Who Loved Me

2. Moonraker

3. Diamonds are Forever

4. Casino Royale

5a. Thunderball (tie)

5b. On Her Majesty's Secret Service

What I Would Do If I Were President

(I realize very few of these would ever be passed.)

1. Create a special council to decide America's role in tackling global poverty, the AIDS epidemic, preventable diseases, and unjust trade systems resulting in a widening economic gap between first and third world countries.

2. Create a 9/11 style commission to address American's energy future, providing both short-term and long-term strategies for energy independence and reforming the energy grid, and advising which alternative fuels are most viable to explore and research and have the most production potential.

3. Address the drunken-driving epidemic (to be discussed in the future).

4. Reform the prison system.

5. Reform the welfare system, transitioning to a more streamlined, organized workfare-based system with more mandates and time-based requirements. (Include healthcare coverage.)

6. Outlaw all abortions, except in cases where their is a threat to materal health (which is rare), expanding adoption and foster care systems, making them more accessible and creating more financial incentives, while simultaneously shutting down all abortion providers.  (Without prosecuting  women trying to obtain abortions.)

7. Create a comprehensive immigration reform package, securing the border, creating a guest worker program, prosecuting businesses and companies employing illegal aliens, and making legal immigration easier.  (to be discussed in the future.)

8. Legalize drugs to all 18 and over (with the possible exception of some hallucinogens and methamphetamines), drop the legal alcohol consumption and purchasing age to 18, legalize prostitution and gambling for all 18 and over, or at least give this power to each state.  Create better anti-drug education systems.

9. Through incrementalist methodologies (such as merit pay for teachers, expansion of voucher programs, more school choice through open enrollment, and greater accountability for schools, leading to budget cuts or closure of failing schools) privatize schooling and shrink the Department of Education to an independent oversight  agency (similar to the Securities and Exchange Commission).  

10. Reform the tax system, creating a less graduated, flatter code with lower tax rates.

11. Create a new military branch of peacekeepers, trained to assist countries in transition after a war (such as Iraq or Afghanistan).  

12. Create better congressional accountability, cutting the August Recess in half, mandating term limits for all Congresspersons and  Senators, and require those office-holders running for

a higher office to designate someone to serve in their place for the duration of the campaign.   

Interesting Places I've Visited

A comprehensive list of the interesting places I've visited.

-Mount Vernon (home of George Washington) and grave

-Monticello (home of Thomas Jefferson) and grave

-Hyde Park (home of FDR)

-Dwight D. Eisenhower's home

-Lincoln's childhood home

-Gettysburg

-Harper's Ferry

-Antietam

-Bull Run/Manassas

-Chickamauga

-Lookout Mountain/Chattanooga

-Stone Mountain

-Fort Sumter

-Fort Necessity

-Williamsburg, Virginia

-Biltmore Estate (Vanderbilt's)

-Marble House (Vanderbilt's)

-Pearl Harbor

-Diamond Head Crater (Hawaii)

-Grand Canyon

-Bryce Canyon

Yosemite National Park

-Glen Canyon

-Zion Canyon

-The Strip (Las Vegas)

-Crater Lake

-Mono Lake

-Lake Mead

-Lake Tahoe

-Lake Champlain (Burlington, Vermont)

-Ben and Jerry's Headquarters (Waterbury, Vermont)

-Von Trapp family residence (Stowe, Vermont)

-"Painted Desert" (Arizona)

-"Petrified Forest" (Arizona)

-Meteor Crater (Arizona)

-Hoover Dam

-Ford's Theater and Lincoln's death site

-Arlington National Cemetery

-all major Washington D.C. landmarks

-childhood home of Carl Sandberg

-Major League Baseball Hall of Fame

-first Starbucks (Seattle)

-first Wendy's (Columbus)

-first Ghirardelli's (San Francisco)

-Sears Tower

-Golden Gate Bridge

-Niagara Falls

-original Quaker Oats factory and headquarters (Cedar Rapids, Iowa)

-Wright Brothers childhood home

-Wright Brothers Bicycle Shop

-Ivy League universities-Yale, Harvard, Princeton, Dartmouth, Brown, Cornell

 

Palin for President?

People are already talking about the 2012 election.  Of course one of the biggest stories is Sarah Palin.  Many conservatives are excited about the prospect of her candidacy.  I liked Sarah Palin as a VP candidate.  Someone like John McCain doesn't needs someone with all the experience in the world.  She would have been extremely helpful in guiding America towards energy independence and reforming the energy grid, which should be the top priority of any administration right now.  She is also clearly reform-minded, which would have been a good help to John McCain.  She is also has a track record of cutting spending, which would be very helpful, as the current growth of government and the national debt should be a top priority.  She didn't have enough experience to be president, but that's overrated. She was running for vice president, not president.   Obama had practically no experience.  But he had time to mature over the campaign, she didn't.  Many other successful vice presidents have had similar level of experience as her.  Today, advisors and handlers are so important that one person doesn't have that much power and is certainly not alone.  Besides, if something would have happened to McCain (of course this is a double-hypothetical case) she would have likely had experience as a vice president.  She didn't make me any more unsteady than Joe Biden, who seems a little bit bombastic and brash.  (Some of his statements made me wonder if he was trying to throw the election.)  I don't believe for a second that she was as dumb as the media made her out to be.  She couldn't have become a governor that way.  It would be hard to believe she is a diva as well, or she wouldn't be the most popular governor in the country.  In looking at old clips and seeing lower-pressure interviews with her, she is clearly a smart, well-studied woman.  The presidency is a completely different situation.  She wouldn't just be somebody's helper.  Palin clearly does not have the breadth of knowledge or experience to be in charge of the country right now, especially in terms of economics or foreign affairs.  However, there are many things I admire about Mrs. Palin.

1. She seems like a genuinely warm and caring person.

2. She isn't a "politician", she has tackled corruption and excess, even in her own party.  It is a very impressive thing for her to put the state's jet on Ebay and cut the governor's chef.

3. She doesn't seem like an insane partisan like so many politicians, she repeatedly talked about people of all political persuasions finding common ground and such, and actually displayed this in Alaska.  Interviews with her as a mayor show a very humble, practical person.

4. She is not wealthy or elite like so many politicians, but comes from a working class background.

5. She has personal connections to issues, again unlike many politicians, a son in Iraq, a special needs son, a teenage daughter who is pregnant.

That said, I would prefer if she didn't run in '12.  I probably wouldn't vote for her, unless she shows she has significantly increased her knowledge.  Personally, I would like to see her join the senate.  I think she would be a very strong presence and could do some things.  Perhaps she could then think about running in 2016.  But as it stands now, there are several other people who I would support before her.  I like Palin, but I'm not one of these far-right conservatives that thinks she is fully qualified to be president now or wants her to run in the next election. She is a great governor and perhaps a good presidential candidate someday.  She's too conservative for my taste, but I still think she could be a candidate I could vote for someday, but not anytime soon.

 

Oil Crude...About to go up?

I'm wondering if oil prices will start rising soon.  Demand is still low, but I don't know if it can drop too much more.  What I'm really interested  is to see how the increased piracy along the coast of Africa (and a little along South America) affects the price of oil.  Shipping costs are already up this year and insurance rates are steeply increasing due to all of the piracy.  The situation is quickly getting to be a major problem.  That coupled with the OPEC's attempts to decrease production are distorting the market.  Just what we need.

My Prayer

This is a prayer/poem I wrote.  Forgive me if it not good, but I wrote it quickly in the middle of the night.  But I kinda liked it.

Lord, 

Guide my steps.

Pick me up when I fall.

Humble me when I think I know it all.

Help me to become more like you everyday, in every way.

Give me the strength, courage, and maturity to do the right thing when it's not easy.

Help me love others as you do, help me do unto others as you would do.  

Help my heart to stay strong but my spirit meek.

Let me feel your love when the future looks bleak.

Intrusion

This week eHarmony was forced to start a gay-dating website to avoid hefty fines.  A man sued eHarmony for discrimination because they only offered services for heterosexuals.  (Though there are thousands of other homsexual dating websites.)  This is a private company.  They have the right to decide who they want to serve.  The founder is a Christian, and he questions homosexuality.  Why is the government forcing him to go against his convictions?

In Canada, courts ruled that extremely obese pay must be given two seats for the price of one. That means there is less capacity on the plane for other passengers.  Which means their profit margin shrinks.  Why should a company be punished for someone's irresponsibility and failure to take care of their body?  (Unless their is a legitimate medical condition.)

Too Big?

I think the current economic situation is tragic.  It is not a good sign when a whole economy is dependent on a few corporations.  It is also not a good sign when governments get so big that corporations are dependent on a government to keep them afloat.  These are dangerous situations.  

Justice

I recently ran into a woman who said that she had moved from an American Baptist church to a Southern Baptist church, because the American Baptists were essentially too liberal.  They didn't talk enough about salvation or the punishment of God.  Many conservative Christians talk about God being a god of justice.  They say that people forget that God does punish people.  Yes, that is true.  God does judge people and He does render consequences.  He isn't a wimp that just puts up with sin or looks the other way.  He doesn't blindly offer salvation to the unrighteous.  But the Bible also says that "God is love".  His heart isn't hard.   What does justice entail?  Justice is people getting what they deserve.  But is justice only punishment for wrong actions (sin?)  No. Justice is also respect, love, and help for the poor and the oppressed.  It is helping the poverty-stricken, mentally or physically, gain the life that they deserve.  God is a god of justice, but their are two sides to justice, not just one.  It is a tragedy lest we forget either side.   

Obama's Choose School

I saw that the Obama's have decided to send their daughters to a Quaker School, Sidwell Friends.  I was hoping they would.  Hopefully more people will think explore the Quaker faith or the values of Friends with this news.  It does seem strange though.  These two girls get a better education than millions of other kids just because they are the children of a politician.  

Holiday Movies

Here are some movies I'm interested in seeing this holiday season. Though I will probably only see a couple.

Quantum of Solace (again)

The Reader

The Spirit

Valkyrie

Star Trek

The Tale of Despereaux

Dark Streets

The Lodger 

UP

The Day the Earth Stood Still

The Beautiful Truth

Fears of the Dark

Gran Torino

2012

Dear Zachary

Time Crimes

Journalistic Integrity

The collapse of journalism continues in America.  Of course, the media is supposed to report the news, unbiased, so the viewer can accurately come up with their own opinions.  But that isn't happening now.  Most media outlets just editorialize.  These are just a few things that have annoyed me.  If I am going to watch or read them, I deserve better.  

The most offensive thing in the campaign was the lack of fact-checking.  Candidates could basically say whatever, without the media holding them accountable.  Most of the time, after debates, networks directed you to their website if you wanted to check the facts.  If you wanted to check the facts.  Of course the vast majority of Americans don't know the facts and don't care to check them.  

Once during the campaign the New York Times published an editorial by Barack Obama criticizing John McCain.  John McCain wanted to write a rebuttal, but they refused.

When Sarah Palin recently appeared on Larry King Live, which used to be a somewhat good program, the screen read "Sarah Palin" Unscripted, Unedited, Unleashed."  Is this show trying to give Palin a fair shot, an unbiased interview?  Or are they pushing this idea that she is out of control and all about herself?  It sounds like yellow journalism to me.  Of course no one should think that Larry King Live is unbiased at all, with Bill Maher or Michael Moore on literally almost every week, and conservatives making few appearances except on panels.

It didn't bother me people asking about Sarah Palin's readiness or qualifications.  That is a fair question.  But the news media didn't do that.  They tried to mold her as an idiot who didn't know anything.  (And does really anyone think that you could go to college and become a governor and not know that Africa is a continent?)  Of course, they labeled the supposed scandal in her state as "troopergate" before there was any ruling about her wrongdoing or possible culpability.  Of course, the media also lied about Sarah Palin's comment about the Iraq War.  She never said that the war was God's will.  She said we should pray that we are doing God's will and that the war "really is a task from God".  But they just played part of the clip, to take it out of context. That is one thing that in the past that couldn't have happened in the past. But in today's media, people can lie and get away with it.  Of course, her wardrobe was also questioned (honestly, I couldn't care less.  Who cares how much they are spending on clothes? Did they ever ask how much the Obama campaign was spending on clothes for Barack or Michelle or the Bidens or how much the speech in Denver cost?)  They also sent people to go to her church to find out about her controversial views?  I saw how segments about her views on evolution.  Like I care?  Was Obama ever asked about his views on evolution?  I guess it is important, since anyone who questions evolution is an idiot.  Her religious views were described as "controversial".  Barack Obama's weren't, even though I saw much more proof of extremism at Trinity United.

Now, NBC and MSNBC are marketing their documentary film "Yes We Can: The Barack Obama story".  NBC is running a commercial that says "Watch as a new leader renews America's hope". Why is a news organization doing this?  They are there to report the news, not give their opinion.  Now I have to watch commercials lecturing me about what I can do to stop global warming when I watch NBC, like I'm three.

What Would Jesus Say?

Tonight, I watched the interview with the escort that ruined former New York governor Elliott Spitzer's career.  (He ruined his own career actually.)  She explained that she thought of her job as merely that, a job.  Instead of a man taking her out on a date and expecting something in return in bed, it was a formal transaction.  She spoke of her trials and tribulations, dropping out of high school, being betrayed by a man she thought loved her, and being berated by the community when she moved back home.  She spoke of what she wanted to become.  A mother with a supportive husband who could be her best friend, a good career, a home, and kids.  

Later, on Nightline, I watched a story about the economic downturn and its effects on the prostitution industry.  (Being legal in Nevada.)  There are more women than ever applying for jobs at the world-famous Bunny Ranch.  They followed a new girl, who was in her early twenties, if not younger, and nervous as a puppy.  She had applied at food food joints and a daycare center without success.  The owner, a former prostitute, and another female executive led the girl around, revealing to her the ins and the outs of the world's oldest industry.  One woman said that she can always count on business, because people will always pay for "alcohol, drugs, and sex."  It was just a matter of how much less people were going to pay.  Another woman said that business is steady because it is a stress reliever for so many people.  Yet another women explained to the new employee (yes that sounds strange to call them that) the art of price haggling.  It just feels so wrong to see people put a price on that and see people bid on it.  I looked weird to see women holding the hands of men as they guided them back to their "room".  It was fake love.  It just felt so wrong.

Later, while watching ESPN, I heard that Michael Vick, the former Atlanta Falcons star QB (and Virginia Tech Hookie) who is now in prison felonies stemming for his operation a large dog fighting outfit, hung three dogs last spring who didn't past muster in the ring.

Now it is easy to judge these people.  It is easy to look down upon a prostitute.  Maybe even easier to look down upon a dog fighter.  It is easy to hate them.  But my question is, "What Would Jesus say to them"?  Would he judge them blindly or look at them in light of their circumstances.  When looking at the escort of the former governor, it is easy to connect her problems with her upbringing.  She clearly lacked self-esteem and after dropping out of high school she couldn't make much money.  So it was easy to become a prostitute.  She could make money and she didn't have much of a self-esteem to begin with, though she would be appreciated for something.  She has the same dreams as most people.  A good, supportive family.  The best thing she said was that she is not the woman who was the prostitute and that she is a new person now.  Sadly, however, she was obviously still struggling to find herself and support.  But she didn't mention faith, which is truly tragic.  It is important, I think, to remember that the prostitute is probably not that different than you.  They probably have many of the same goals and aspirations, they just got mixed up along the way.

I think it is also important to think about the young woman who is now working as a prostitute in Nevada.  She'd applied at fast food places and a daycare center.  She isn't a terrible person. Next time I eat fast food, I'll try to imagine the worker as a prostitute.  Because they could be. Is a prostitute not just a troubled person?   Maybe they just got lucky and landed the job at the fast food place.   What if that girl would serve you the next time you go to McDonald's.  You wouldn't even know that she could be a prostitute.  Yet, if you knew she had dabbled in prostitution I bet you (and I) would treat her differently.   Even if the person is not a prostitute, they could have just as many troubles as the prostitutes.  You just can't tell.  Because it is not only prostitutes do bad things.  Everyone does.  Prostitutes are people too.  They are not a secondary class of citizens. God loves everyone.  Anyone can mess up, and everyone does.  A prostitute or a burger flipper should not be looked at any differently.  It is easy to judge someone and think of them as subhuman or stupid or not worthy of mercy because of their job. But everyone, even the prostitute deserves our respect and our love.  In fact, they don't deserve any less love than the fast food worker.  If anything they deserve more because they are lost.  It is not easy to take a non-biased, loving look at someone, thinking about their past and how it affected them.  It is hard to not look down at such people and not make a quick judgement.  It isn't easy to throw their mistakes out the window with forgiveness to recognize their potential, but it needs to be done.   Jesus doesn't call people to do easy things.  He calls us to a supernatural, world-changing love and forgiveness.  

Again, it would be easy to judge Michael Vick.  It would be easy to lose all respect for him and not care about him.  But his situation is better understood in light of his childhood.  He and his three siblings were born to unwed teenagers, who lived on government welfare throughout Michael's upbringing.  Their street witnessed many murders and drug deals.  It wouldn't be easy for him to learn the proper morals.  It was terrible what he did and he should be punished. But prison should be a place for rebirth.  He deserves a second chance and a shot at forgiveness, but something tells me many won't give him a chance, because they view him as some sort of a barbarian, instead of a troubled person.   

While I believe Jesus would not support the activities of these people for a second, it is a question of how he would react in opposition.  Would he arrogantly look at the prostitute or the abuser of  defenseless animals, expecting perfection?  It is so easy to look down on people without remembering your own flaws.  I believe that Jesus always would remember that people are not perfect and everyone has their own problems and struggles.  In looking at his dealings with sinners, the woman at the well for instance, I think Jesus wants us to look at people in the context of their life.  Instead of making a quick judgement, I believe he would be slow to speak and quick to listen.  It is only when we follow that lead that we can understand what Jesus would say to the unsavory characters in our lives.

Quantum of Solace

As a big fan of the James Bond franchise, I was both happy and disappointed with the new film, Quantum of Solace.  The film was shoot well and has some good action.  Daniel Craig was again exceptional portraying 007.  The film definetely had a very good, upbeat, suspenseful quality to it.  It was good movie, but certainly not great.  First, there was too much action, especially towards the start of the movie.  There  was chase after chase, seemingly for no reason. Characters like Mr. White, Fields, and Mathis were all hastily introduced and quickly killed without much explanation.  The movie also took place in six different locales, which was slightly confusing.  The movie was a whirlwind.  The plot was choppy.  Characters were barely introduced, there was a chase sequence, and then Bond would travel somewhere else.  There just weren't good transitions; it was almost like a  riddle.  There were loose ends that were not tied up.  It was hard to get a feel for what was going on.  Near the end of the film, Vesper's "boyfriend" was introduced to us, but he had barely been mentioned throughout the film.  I also thought the confrontation between Bond and Greene warranted more of a dramatic end. Speaking of Greene, he was a good villain.  He certainly looked psychopathic.  Though he lacked  a strong physical feature or abnormality like so many of the other Bond villains have had.  I thought the film sacrificed action for plot.  The story just could have been crafted a little more effectively.  The action was also a little to extravagant and outrageous for me.  Some of the chase scenes that were on foot, where they scale buildings for instance, are a little too over the top and unbelievable.  Or the scene where Bond is able to fall safely out of the airplane.  I know there is a certain element like that in most Bond films, where things are slightly unrealistic, but know Bond looks like Superman.  The movies also seem to be increasingly violent.  Of course there will be violence in any Bond film, but the best Bond films aren't built on sheer violence, but plot.  The violence is just getting a tad bit too graphic for Bond.  Lastly is the fact that the film had almost no connection with other films from the franchise, save for Casino Royale of course.  One of the good things about Bond films is how they are all tied together in unique ways.  There was no Q, no special, innovative weaponry or technology for Bond, and few of 007's typical mannerisms or habits came through.  Overall, it is a good effort.  It is a fun movie to watch.  It just could have been done better.  It would have been good to slow things down a little and develop the plot a little more.  I don't want Bond to be like any other pop film, with too many chases and too much violence.  I'm sure most casual Bond viewers think it was great, but compared to most Bond films it was only middle-of-the-pack.  I would give the film 3.5 out of 5 stars.

What Would Reagan Do?

Both Democrats and Republicans have love affairs with certain politicians.  One of the Republicans' favorites is Ronald Reagan.  Whenever I listen to Sean Hannity, when I can stand it, I hear him ask "What Would Reagan Do?"  At a Republican primary debate last year, the last question was "Would Ronald Reagan Endorse You?".  (It should be noted that it was at the Reagan library.)  But my question is why I should care what Reagan would do.  It seems odd to me that the phrase "What Would Jesus Do?" is just changed, so the Jesus is dropped and replaced by Reagan, giving him a certain God-like status.  Why should politicians be venerated like this?  It seems wildly inappropriate.  Sadly, only his spirit is with now.  So why should I care what he would do?  Did Ronald Reagan solve the illegal immigration problem?  No.  Did Ronald Reagan balance the budget and free us from debt?  No.  Did Ronald Reagan solve the energy crisis?  No.  So why should I care what he would do?  He wasn't perfect and he didn't have all the answers.  He was a great president, but I am not going to base my beliefs on what he did or even who he would endorse.  The "Founding Fathers" are also treated with nearly divine status.  People ask what they would do or think.  Why should I care?  They were around 200 years ago.  If I just listened to them I would be a slave-holding deist.  Again, they were great leaders, but not perfect.  I am not going to ask myself what someone would do before I vote.  I don't care.  I only care about what I think works NOW, today, in the context of the constitution, and I couldn't care less if it is the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, the Libertarian Party, or the Constitution Party that supports it.   

Ted Stevens Defeated

I have bittersweet feelings about the defeat of Ted Stevens, the longest serving Republican senator, from Alaska.  It means one fewer senate seat for Republicans and one more for Democrats as they try to reach that magical filibuster-proof threshold of 60 seats.  Of course, they still could get that without Saxby Chambliss or Norm Coleman losses to Jim Martin and Al Franken, respectively, if Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman side with them.  I think the government is better when there is a little gridlock and some compromise is necessary.  Just look at the last eight years compared to the last decade (the 90s).  (Or the first six years of the Bush administration, as Democrats have controlled congress since the '06 midterm elections.) With so much power and supposed/perceived mandates, one party abuses their power.  This concerns me with the Democrats now controlling the executive branch, house, and senate.  Obama and the Dems will likely have even more power than Bush, because he will likely have a "liberal" Supreme Court as well.  Bush didn't not have a majority in the Supreme Court.  And it appears Obama wants the court to be an arm of his administration, as indicated by his voting records and statements.  (To be expounded on later.)  So, it is hard for me to see a Republican lose a seat.  However, it is Ted Stevens, a convicted felon.  It is one less corrupt individual.  It wouldn't help anyone to have a felon in the senate.  I cuts down on corruption, but at what cost?  It also eliminates one senator that is simply not qualified to be a government official.  Can anyone say, in all seriousness, that the 84-year old Stevens, the 91 year-old Robert Byrd, the 84-year old Daniel Inouye, 84-year-old Frank Lautenberg, or the 84-year old Daniel Akaka should still be senators?  (Akaka, at 84, is the junior senator from his state...which I find comical.)  Stevens is proof that no one in there mid-80s should be government officials.  They deserve the retirement anyway.  I'm not saying that they were bad senators (or that they were good) but c'mon, no one should be in the U.S. Senate at that age.  They had their time to pursue their agenda and it is time to let some younger people take over.  So I am happy and sad that Ted Stevens lost his seat.  Someone younger and less corrupt is good but excesive power to either party is bad.

A Couple Sports Thoughts

Thinking about the most successful men's college basketball teams in history, the best seem to wear blue jerseys.  Kentucky, Duke, North Carolina, Kansas, and UCLA.  I wonder why the most successful programs all wear blue.  It there something to it?  It does seem appropriate, as blue gives off an air of success, aristocracy, and confidence.  I wonder what the most popular color in the world is.  What percentage of people say each color is there favorite.  Anyway, I am excited that the Purdue men's squad will again be very good.  I miss there strong teams of 8-10 years ago, with the likes of Brian Cardinal and Carson Cunningham.  And of course the coaching of Gene Keady.  I do not care about the end of the Steelers-Chargers game last week and I don't know what the controversy is or why anybody cares.  The last play didn't determine the outcome of the game, why is everyone getting their pants in a bunch?

Lieberman Keeps Chairmanship

I see Senator Joe Lieberman will retain his role as chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, thanks to Barack Obama.  Many Democrat leaders, like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, were attempted to oust him out of the position because they were angry he supported John McCain.  They were putting themselves and their party first, ahead of their country.  I am glad Obama took the high ground; he should be looked up to for putting any hard feelings behind him. Other Democratic leaders should take note if this and act more maturely.  There are too many challenges to worry about right now to care about such petty, childish things as revenge.  Perhaps Barack Obama has learned this.  Hopefully, this is a sign of things to come, with Obama taking on the leaders of his party who have led the most unpopular, unaccomplished congress ever the last two years.  

Unity and Support?

Democrats are now telling me that I should support the next president.  Democrats are telling me that I should put past differences aside.  Democrats are saying I should respect him and embrace him.  Democrats are telling Republicans that the country now needs to united around Barack Obama.  This after the Democrats:

Called the president a warmonger when they disagreed with them.

Called the president a war criminal when they disagreed with him.

Called the president a racist when they disagreed with him.

Called the president mentally challenged when they disagreed with him.

Called the president an idiot and/or stupid when they disagreed with him.

Said the president only cared about the rich when they disagreed with him.

Said the president "wasn't their president" when they disagreed with him.

Called Condi Rice and Colin Powell "Uncle Tom's" for serving with the president.

And now the Democrats want me to suddenly support Obama and be respectful?

I will, and already do, support Obama.  I did the instant he was elected.  He is now my president.  I will honor his authority and disagree with him respectfully.  I hope the country is united and does support Barack Obama.  But not because the Democrats are telling me to. Because I am not a partisan.  Because I am an American.  Because I do not want to stoop to the same low level the Democrats did.

Dems VP Selection

I'm not a big fan of Joe Biden.  There were several candidates who I thought would be terrific candidates for Obama VP, and he didn't select any of them.  Biden clearly hurt the ticket.  Here were my choices.

1. Janet Napolitano:  I'm sorry, this would have been a genius pick and I thought of it in January.  A very, very popular and accomplished governor, from Arizona, Obama supporter, female, Washington "outsider".  What is not to like about any of those things?  Could have taken on McCain in his own state, gotten women and Hillary voters, and looked like someone who isn't from inside the beltway.  Of course she could have also offset Palin if the Republicans would have still picked her. It would have been a PERFECT pick.

2. Bill Richardson: Would have helped out with a swing state, New Mexico, would help out with experience and foreign policy, as a former ambassador, energy, as former energy secretary,  would help out with Latinos, and extremely popular, and a big Obama supporter.  Would have also been an excellent choice.

3. Evan Bayh: Young, moderate, very likable, and from a state that could have been important from Obama, Indiana.  Big Obama supporter.

4. Bob Casey, Jr.: Very popular, young, moderate senator from maybe the most important state in the election, Pennslyvania.  Big Obama supporter.  

I would have picked any of these people before Biden.  They would have all been a tremendous asset to the ticket.   Especially Janet Napolitano.  

Future Leaders of The Republican Party

Some of the people who could be key Republican players in the future:

1. Bobby Jindal

2. Eric Cantor

3. Jon Huntsman, Jr.

4. Mike Huckabee

5. Jeff Flake

6. Sarah Palin

7. Matt Blunt

8. Mitt Romney

9.Rob Portman

10. Mike Turner

11. Adam Putnam

12. Tim Pawlenty

13. Paul Ryan

14. mark Sanford

"Joe the Plumber"-hmmn he's says he might run for Congress in 2010.

More Craziness

So we got over the lipstick on the pig crap.  Now we're talking about how much Sarah Palin is spending on her outfits.  Things seem to be regressing in American politics.

VP Debate

A few thoughts on the debate:

I thought Biden ate up Palin during the first 15-20 minutes.  She really stepped up her game as she became more comfortable and came on strong near the end.

This debate was like the first presidential debate of 2008.  I don't think there was any clear winner.  In the first presidential debate I gave a slight edge to McCain, tonight I give a slight edge to Biden.

-I thought Biden, like usual, had a great debate.  But that hasn't seemed to materialize into votes.  Of course, against someone like Palin (where he has much more experience) it isn't that hard to have a good debate.  I think he is a very good debater and very good speaker.

-I thought Gwen Iffil did an excellent job, though I would have liked a little more follow-ups and pressing.

-I wish things weren't so scripted.  Both were.  But it is so obvious it is rehearsed when you see Biden or Obama.  The first answer, in both debates, they each  went here's point 1, point 2, point 3, point 4.  

-Palin did she her inexperience, but she didn't embarrass herself or make any huge mistakes.  The main thing is she didn't hurt the ticket.

-I wonder how much either, but especially Palin, appealed to independents.  

-I wish she would stop repeating these catchy lines.

-I love all these made up stories about people that Joe Biden always brings.  Yeah, some guy really said "Oh Joe, I don't know how much it costs, I don't have enough to pay."

-I would really hope to Biden has a better answer defending income distribution than "Where I  come from it's called fairness."

-Why was Biden smiling?  He looked arrogant.

-She didn't do a very good job of counter-punching.  He said something and she didn't argue it.  Or she attacked him or Obama, he answered, and she didn't refute it.

-Both came across as jovial and caring.  Though I can't help but think about his low giving to charity.

-She did a very good job of detailing her accomplishments and how she can build on them as vice president.

-I love all the supporters from each side.  "He clearly won.  She clearly won."

-She did what she needed to do.  Didn't hurt herself and put some energy in the ticket.

Why I Like the Presidential Candidates

I am thankful we have two candidates to be the next vice president who are actually capable of being themselves.  These days, not many politicians act like themselves.  It is all about perception and what people are going to think.  Yes, Joe Biden talks a lot, and yes he makes a lot of gaffes.  But who cares?  Everyone says something crazy every once and awhile.  Everyone messes up.  So he said that FDR got on the TV after the markets collapsed in 1929.  That's funny.  Very funny.  Let's all have a laugh over it!  I like to see the real Joe.  I like to see the Joe that's not perfect and has a temper.  I respect him for being himself, and not trying to act like a little model of the perfect vice presidential candidate.  Real people aren't like that.  

As for Sarah Palin, I think one of the best things about her injection into the race was her refreshing "all-american" life.  Very few politicians can claim that.  Joe Biden can't, George Bush certainly can't, Al Gore can't, John McCain can't, John Edwards can't, John Kerry can't, Mitt Romney can't, Barack Obama can't.  They are all rich, born in good circumstances, or educated at an Ivy League school.  Agree with her or not, you have to say that she's just the average American.  The sad thing is that the McCain campaign isn't letting her by herself.  She doesn't know everything.  But she doesn't need to.  I wish they could stop her scripted answers.  Let her show that she understands the American people and understands their struggles.  She's not insulated like the rest.  She has family problems just like anyone else.  Her husband works long hours. 

I grateful we have two  veep candidates that are probably closer to you or me than 99% percent of the other politicians in Congress.  I want someone like Joe Biden or Sarah Palin as my vice president.  I would rather vote for someone who is not perfect than someone who wants to act like they are.  I personally find the paradox very funny.  People want a president just like them, but they also want someone better, someone wiser, than them.

McCain Campaign Suspension, Two Ideas to Make Congress More Prodcutive

I totally agree with John McCain that the political campaigns should be suspended for the next couple of days.  I am slightly disturbed, but not at all surprised, that Obama has decided to stay on the trail.  It's all he knows.  He doesn't know about actually working in Washington.  He's spent most of his time in the senate campaigning for himself instead of actually working in Washington.  If I were a newly-elected congressman or senator, I would introduce two bills to make congress more productive.  One would require those who will be campaigning for themselves to delegate someone to serve in their absence.  Second, I would cut the August recess in half.  (And yes I am aware neither would pass.)  Hopefully, it would generate public pressure on politicians to be more productive and accountable.  

Biden...patriotism and charity.

You probably saw Joe Biden said it is "patriotic" to pay higher taxes".  He said it is time for [the wealthy] to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut."  He also said that they want to take money for the wealthy and "put it back into the hands of middle-class people".  What a scary proposition.  First, it is scary to think that Obama and Biden could be in the White House when they can be lead to believe in something (this notion of class warfare in the form of income taxation) that is obviously false.  Second, this sound like communism.  Biden may (or may not) be patriotic, but he sure doesn't seem very charitable.  May be a record-low in giving to charities for a Democrat.  Even lower giving than Al Gore, John Kerry, John Edwards, or Barack Obama.  (The Clintons, by the way, give a decent amount away).  I guess Biden doesn't think it is patriotic to give money to private, and probably more effective, charities.  Only giving to the government.  Two good articles:

OSU-USC

I'm from Ohio.  And I'm an Ohio State fan.  For college football fans, this week's OSU-USC game should be a beauty.  I'll gave you my thoughts from an OSU fan.

-I would be very surprised if Chris Wells doesn't play.  I don't think his injury is a major conspiracy as some suggest, but if there is anyway he can play he will.  He's literally always injured.  I won't lie, I'm doubting OSU.  The mindset after struggling versus OU and losing Chris Wells is hard to get a pulse on.  Wells is the engine that runs the train, and it will be hard to win without him.  But I've also learned not to doubt Jim Tressel, and I'm sure he has a few tricks up his sleeve.  I'll be interested to see how he uses Terrelle Pryor.  

-On offense: I'm concerned about the OSU wideouts getting separation from USC's cornerbacks.  Brian Robiskie is a very good wide receiver, but he's not a speed guy.  Brian Hartline is, but he hasn't played too well as of late, especially against big competition.  I think he has it in him, we'll just have to see if it comes out.  Ray Small is the key.  tOSU's fastest player, he can be the gamebreaker.  He's dealt with consistency issues, but after returning a punt for a TD last week, it looks like he may have turned the corner.  If tOSU is to win, he must play well.  (I would try to get Lammar Thomas involved a little too.)  With the speed of USC's defense, and with the athleticism and experience of linebackers Ray Maualuga, Brian Cushing, and rover Taylor Mays, the Buckeye tight ends may not be a factor receiving.  But tOSU needs to try to get them involved.  Especially Jake Ballard.  If Beanie Wells doesn't play, OSU doesn't really have a bruiser.  So it is crucial OSU must gameplan to get the running backs in space.  Todd Boeckman must also be careful with the ball.  USC is better than any team in the country at forcing turnovers (+102 in turnover margin since Pete Carroll got there, best in the nation) and you can't afford to give the USC offense more chances.  Lastly on the offensive side, the line must get better push.  The USC linemen will eat the running backs and Todd Boeckman alive if they are not controlled.  There must be a lot of diverse offensive schemes so they don't get too comfortable.  The OSU line is huge, and they must be physical.

-On defense: The line must get penetration and get in the backfield.  If Sanchez  is given time,with the talent USC is having, he will find them all day for big games.  When they get into the backfield they must wrap up and finish the play.  Last week against OU, play after play OSU got a hand on the QB and they couldn't make the tackle.  You can't afford that against USC. When you've got a USC player, you've got to make the play when you have the chance, or it will be a big gain.  OSU should also not worry about giving up big plays.  Against USC, it will happen.  It is stopping them 30 yards out from the endzone and closer that they need to not let the big plays.  Bend, but do not break.  The OSU defense must also not allow any receiver to get a rapport with Matt Sanchez or it will be hard to stop.   Lastly on defense, the defensive tackles must, must, must not get harassed.  With USC's speed and athletic ability, OSU's linebacker must be freed to roam and make plays.  They must clog up the middle.  If USC can exploit the middle, they'll get into open space where the Buckeyes sometimes struggle. 

-On special teams: Special teams is a huge part of Tresselball, and it will be huge against USC.  They need to pin USC back as far as possible.  Don't allow big returns and make the field smaller for USC.   On offense, any help against he USC defense you can get is needed.  So, win the battle of field position.  And don't miss any field goals or PATs.

The Characters of the 2008 Election

   Who wrote the 2008 election?  Yes, who wrote it?  Somebody had to write it.  Somebody is playing with our minds.  We are living in a dreamland.  This election defies the laws of the universe.  It is simply not possible for an election to get this strange.  Just look at the cast of characters involved.  Hillary Clinton.  Bill Clinton.  John McCain.  Barack Obama.  Sarah Palin.  These people can't be real.  Someone had to put this together.  The first African-American who has a real chance to be President and the first women who has the first real chance to be Vice President.  Two of the most polarizing women in recent history.  A former president who...well, is entertaining.  The most unpopular president and most unpopular war in decades, yet his candidate very well could win the election.  Google/Youtube Debates.  Faith Forums. The longest campaign ever.  An affair.  A recent VP candidate switches teams.  The Fair Tax.  If you need any more evidence, well, we're now arguing over pigs wearing lip stick and paternity claims.  Sad too.  They distract us from finding out who is playing this evil trick on us.  I'm wondering how many chapters this book has.  Every election is getting stranger.  This is the author's best novel yet.  I bet the next will be a best seller!